Food industry, food service & retail
News, information and comments about food and beverage manufacturing, food service, retail and personal care
Future Food

History of FSMA

By | Non classé, Regulations | No Comments

At first, food was hunted for but as societies developed people bought from a nearby market and after the industrial revolution and a new form of living people had to buy their food in impersonal superstores where there were aisles and aisles of food from all over the country and all over the world.

People at the time of trading and local markets certainly did not think to wonder about what it was they were eating because they trusted the people they bought the food from. They already knew where it was grown and how it was grown, because more likely than not the food was grown locally. But when the world started trading more and more food and there was more and more people to feed, those certainties became blurred. In winter you couldn’t be sure the apples you were buying were from the nearby orchard or from across the globe, and that is when the importance of food labeling came into play.

Starting about a century and a half ago in 1862, President Lincoln launched the department of Agriculture and the Bureau of chemistry, which were the predecessors to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). There weren’t too many acts passed for fifty years, but in 1924 the Supreme Court ruled that the Food and Drugs Act condemned every statement on a product’s label that was misleading, which is similar to today’s regulations about having all the ingredients listed as well as the health benefits the product may or may not have. Much later in 1958, the Food Additives Amendment was enacted, requiring manufacturers to declare all additives in a product, much like how today all allergens must be labeled clearly and in a different font of color in order to stand out more to the consumer. And it isn’t until 1994- only twenty years ago! – that food labels are required to list basic per-serving nutritional information and an important nutrients list.

However, it isn’t until 2002 that regulations and the shaping of the nutrition label that we see today started. Starting with the Farm Bill of 2002 that required retailers to provide the country-of-origin labeling for fresh beef, pork, and lamb. However, due to stakeholder pressures and repeated debilitation, the law only came into effect 7 years later in 2009. We then had the announcement that the FDA would require food labels to label trans-fat content in 2003 which went into effect in 2006. Many manufacturers during these years such as, PepsiCo and Kellogg launched products and packaging that showed off what was healthy about their product to their consumers, such as front labeling of essential nutrients and health plans. It is during this time period that consumers began to be more conscious and demanding about what they wanted to be consuming. And in 2010, the USDA required cuts of meat to have labeling as well for the country-of-origin and slaughter location.

Finally, in 2011, the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) was signed into law by President Obama, who aims to ensure that the U.S. food supply is safe by shifting the focus of federal regulators from responding to contamination to now preventing it. These new measures are to ensure that contaminated food is stopped before it is eaten by consumers.

The development of food labels and food safety was a long one, and if done sooner would have certainly saved many from getting sick. But now that regulations have been made and continue to be updated year to year, food is a lot safer than it has ever been.

To learn more about FSMA regulations and or to see the differences between FSMA and its European counterpart INCO, click here.

For information on what you can do to internationalize your product and conform to multiple label regulations, please visit http://www.lascom.com/ .

Read More

Technical Reference- Steering evolution is necessary

By | Innovation, Methods and technology | No Comments

In one of the first articles of the blog, we emphasized the importance of managing the evolution of data and thus having a dynamic vision rather than static information. Since the subject has recently returned repeatedly during discussions with prospects and customers, let’s put it to the agenda of the PLM blog.

Many people think that to manage products, systems, or infrastructure, all you need is a repository for a “data warehouse” to centralize all the documents and all the data. That’s certainly the first step, but it’s far from being enough. In fact, the primary need for industrialists is primarily related to the management of the evolution of data and products more than it is to have a static view of this data.

In the sectors of industry and construction, everything is about “movement” and evolution (innovation, development, change, etc.). A technical reference is not meant to be a virtual archive room. What matters is not the “picture data” but their creation and evolution over time.

Effectively managing change involves having a vision of the environment of each piece of data:

In order to effectively steer the developments throughout the life cycle, you must not only manage the technical data but also the links between the different elements and the entire modification process (decisions, actors, impacts, etc.). In fact, the data of the products are so linked that any change to any element can have impacts throughout the entire chain.

To optimize the dynamic tracking of products, we must make an environmental vision linked to each data. This is where we see the functional limits of simple document management– data that can handle the states but ca not bind the elements together and follow patterns, consequences, and impacts of the amendments (the “Why, What, Who, How to”.).

Effectively managing change is more complex than we would first imagine it to be.

Read More
produit laitier

Case Study: How to optimize the cycle of innovation and production in the dairy sector?

By | Industry News, Innovation, Methods and technology | No Comments

Let’s take the example of the French industrial specializing in desserts grouped under the name “Yoghurt”. In this industry, there are many ingredients for a product, and there is, therefore, a lot of information necessary for R&D to be calculated such as for example nutritional value and the cost which is why a PLM solution is essential to keep everything clear and on track.

Read More

Page 1 of 912345...9
You have a project?
Ask questions about Lascom products to our team of experts; we will be glad to answer you as soon as possible. Express your needs and expectations; we will do our best to organize a meeting with our sales team.